Jehovah’s Witness’ roots: An introduction to C.T. Russell

by Todd Hebert

Criticisms and controversies
As early as 1892 Russell’s views and management style were strongly criticized by certain individuals associated with his ministry. In 1893 a paper was written and circulated to Bible Students in Pittsburgh that expressed concern that Russell was a dictatorial leader, a shrewd businessman who appeared eager to collect funds from the selling of the Millennial Dawn books, cheated one of them out of financial gains, and issued thousands of Millennial Dawn books under a female pseudonym. A booklet entitled A Conspiracy Exposed and Harvest Siftings was written by Russell and issued as an extra to the April, 1894 Zion’s Watch Tower magazine in order to pre-empt attempts to have their views circulated to a wider audience of Bible Students.

In 1897 Russell’s wife left him after disagreeing over the management of Zion’s Watch Tower magazine. She expressed that, as his wife, she should have equal control over its administration, equal privilege in writing articles, preaching, and traveling abroad as his representative. In 1903 she filed for legal separation on the grounds of mental cruelty, related to what she considered to be forced celibacy, and frequent cold, indifferent treatment. The separation was ultimately granted in 1906, with Russell charged to pay alimony. During the trial her attorney made the claim that Russell had been inappropriately intimate with Rose Ball, a young woman the Russells had cared for as a foster daughter since age ten. She alleged that Ball had told her Russell claimed to be a “jellyfish floating around” to different women until someone responded to his intimacy. Russell defended himself by claiming that not only was she “poisoned” by the women’s suffrage movement, but that all her claims were false. Following her attorney’s claim, page 10 of the court transcript records that Mrs. Russell was asked by the Judge to clarify if she was, in fact, accusing her husband of adultery, and replied “No”. The Washington Post and Chicago Mission Friend reprinted the claim that Russell was a “jellyfish”, and was sued by him for libel. The jury voted in his favor, awarding him one-dollar. After appealing this decision, Russell received a cash settlement of $15,000 (the same buying power as $325,000 in 2006 ) as well as payment of all court costs, an agreement for an article of retraction defending his character, and an agreement that his weekly syndicated sermons be published in their newspapers.

On March 22, 1911, The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, a tabloid newspaper, began publishing articles accusing Russell of gaining profit from a strain of wheat named “Miracle Wheat” by its discoverer, K.B. Stoner of Fincastle, Virginia in 1903. Once other newspapers read this claim, many critics began to insist that Russell had deceived and defrauded many by selling this supposedly advanced strain of wheat for $60 a bushel, far above the average cost of wheat for the day. Throughout 1912 and 1913 the Eagle continued to report on this alleged fraud on Russell’s part. Russell sued the Eagle for libel, but lost. Russell defended himself publicly, and in writing, by claiming that the wheat was donated to the Watch Tower Society, and although sold for $1 per pound Mr. Stoner routinely sold it for a $1.25 per pound. Russell claimed to have no financial connection to the wheat, and that any who were dissatisfied by their purchase and donation were offered a refund as much as one year following purchase. None claimed a refund.

During 1913, other matters of interest were addressed by John Jacob (J.J.) Ross, a minister from Hamilton, Ontario, Canada in his booklet entitled Some Facts about the Self-Styled “Pastor” Charles T. Russell. Russell had taken Ross to court on the charge of libel. Ross attempted to show that when Russell was asked in trial if he possessed knowledge of the Greek alphabet he first claimed he did, then retracted the claim when cross-examined and shown the alphabet. Ross also claimed that Russell blatantly lied when asked if he was an ordained minister by answering “yes”. In answer to Ross’s accusations, Russell stated that he never claimed knowledge of the Greek language, merely the alphabet, and that due to the Judge’s objection to the line of questioning, the book was taken away before he could even see it. He believed that his ordination was “of God” according to the biblical pattern, not requiring any denominational approval, and that his annual election as “Pastor” by over 1,200 congregations worldwide constituted him as “ordained”, or chosen, to be a minister of the gospel.

In recent times, Russell has been accused of having had close ties with Freemasonry. Critics have not only attempted to connect him with any of several different rites of the Free Masons, but have also attempted to show that such associations are connected with occult practices. It has been pointed out that in later editions of his Studies in the Scriptures series a winged solar disk appears on the front cover, which some have claimed is an exclusively Masonic symbol. In his writings, Russell stated that membership in Freemasonry, Knights of Pythias, Theosophy, and other similar groups are unscriptural. He also denied having direct knowledge of Masonic practices and considered membership with these groups to be “grievous evils”. His justification for use of the winged solar-disk originated from his understanding that Malachi 4:2, which denotes a sun with wings, is a symbol that Christ’s millennial Kingdom had begun.
Continue Reading

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Share |

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

Jeffrey Needle

You mention above that the JW’s share the “Armenian” view of salvation. Uhhhh, that should be Arminian. Armenia is a country.

Reply

Todd Hebert

Woops, a little typo there. Thanks for the correction.

Reply

William Barnes

Good read; lot’s of historical detail. Having outgrown a J.W. upbringing, this my musings as to the eclectic mix of beliefs and propagated by the Watchtower Society. Good luck getting them to fess up to chronology of Armageddon false alarms.

Reply

SpiritualBrother

Russell has a beard.Today wearing a beard is frowned on among the JW’s.

Reply

Todd Hebert

True. But, I’m not exactly sure what your point is.

Reply

Dave Hitt

Russell cribbed much of his theology from a then popular religion called the Millerites, who used to stand on oppose sides of the isle and argue “Great Taste!” “Less Filling!” “Great Taste!” “Less Filling!”

While most cults venerate their founders, Jehovah’s Witnesses virtually ignore theirs. Most JWs are completely ignorant of their own history. They’ve never heard of Miracle Wheat. They’re unaware that Rutherford bought a mansion to house the bible prophets who were supposed to be resurrected in 1925. (When they didn’t show up he graciously continued living there himself.) They’re unaware of how many times their organization set dates for Armageddon. Mention any of these facts to Witnesses who show up on your doorstep and you’ll be rewarded with a “dog on the freeway” expression.

Reply

SpiritualBrother

What I meant was that the JW religion of today is far removed from what Russell founded even when it came to trivial stuff like beards let alone other teachings.

Reply

Patrick

I don’t understand why not one member of the congress ever did some serious research concerning the governing body of the JWs. If you read all their cheating:
>false prophesies (1799, 1874, 1914, 1915, 1918,1925, 1941, 1975…) with thereby joined the advise to sell their houses, no children, stop working and pioneering, no higher education
> sympathizing for the political views of Hitler an their anti-Semitism
> involvement for ten years in the UNO: their worst enemy
> Malawi versus Mexico
> manipulating and falsify scientific medical proofs concerning germs and surgical treatment from p.ex; appendicitis
> hiding pedophilia
> prohibition from vaccinations
> prohibition from transplantations,
>murdering blood policy and their falsifying from medical issues concerning the migration from primary blood fractions from fetus to mother and vice versa
> falsifying and misleading teachings concerning the dangers of blood transfusions
> prohibition to give blood and the permission of secondary blood fractions
>the endless list of “deaths” ; the unacceptable killing of premature, baby’s, children, adults
>prohibition of independent thinking
>disfellowship and shunning
>…..
Accusation: GENOCIDE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MURDER
The solution: “International Court of Justice”
Proof: thousands of evidences in their literature and thousands of “witnesses” fighting against their acts of inhumanity

Reply

yehrc

So should the Jehovah’s Witnesses, like the Church of Jesus Christ and Latter-day Saints, be considered an Abrahamic religion of its own rather than a Christian sect?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: